- #Fastrawviewer export for free#
- #Fastrawviewer export manual#
- #Fastrawviewer export full#
- #Fastrawviewer export android#
- #Fastrawviewer export free#
I had no trouble turning jpegs and DNGs into TIFFs and jpegs at varying resolutions, but your mileage may vary some reviewers on Google Play report that the marquee feature is buggy.
#Fastrawviewer export free#
It’s also the only free raw gallery that both gives multiple export options and lets you use them.
For TIFF, additionally choose 8 or 16 bit. #Fastrawviewer export full#
Decode to JPG or TIFF at full or half resolution. Consistent with the app's title, the lone button adorning the UI is named “Decode Raw,” and does as it says on the tin. No watermarks mar the shots, the pictures are full-resolution out of the gate, and panning/zooming is supported (if a little glitchy). Once you find the image you’re looking for, the experience does improve. Once there, a two-wide alphabetical list of icons and filenames with no drag-able scroll-bar stretches down for meters on end. You start in the root directory, and tap your way down to the camera folder (usually /storage/sdcard0/DCIM/Camera). This viewer will get the job done, but it’s as bare bones as they come (and not in a good way). Last updated November 30, 2013, and showing its age. Read on for galleries that fix the issue. Camera FV-5 and A Better Camera either don’t show their images in standard galleries, or the jpeg previews they do show aren’t accurate. No need for special viewers, but check out these editors for touch-ups on the go. #Fastrawviewer export manual#
L Camera and Manual Camera generate accurate jpegs. With Camera FV-5 spacing out shots, and standard image viewers not showing the DNG versions, how are we supposed to catch our blinking family members during portraits before the whole group disperses? Oh, and did I mention that you don’t even have the jpeg fallback with A Better Camera, the fourth app from our rundown? It outputs JPG or DNG, so you’re flying blind while shooting in raw. Longer shutter times appear to space the shots farther apart, but I can’t be sure lengthening the exposure necessarily blurs the stopwatch times together, and the viewfinder itself can’t be timed because its flashes and whirrs are meant as UX cues and not real indicators that the shutter has closed. In other words, the blinking Christmas lights have three one-hundredths of a second to turn off and ruin your shot. After all, we can get by with sticking to jpeg previews if the composition remains the same from file to file. We’ll get to a few apps for viewing raw formats on your phone in a moment, but right now let’s figure out which cameras delay the second shot, and by how much. The answer is that some camera apps take two shots! This wouldn’t be so bad if we had a way to view both images in our camera roll to see if they need a re-do, but as we've already discussed, most galleries filter them out. This makes them “invisible” until we get home, and is the subject of today’s discussion. Raw Capture Delay, And Lying JpegsĪs pointed out by XDA Senior Member Ashcunak, raw images don’t always match their jpeg “duplicates.” It’s true that your camera makes choices about color, saturation, and white balance while compressing to the smaller format, but that doesn’t explain how a blinking Christmas light can look “on” in one format, and “off” in the other. Why not stick to the jpeg preview generated by most cameras? First and foremost, those previews sometimes lie. Raw formats like DNG are TIFF-based, and don’t play well with most galleries. 
No amount of post-processing will fix blinking family members or poorly framed shots, so it’s essential that we see what we have captured. This brings us to viewers and lite editors.
#Fastrawviewer export for free#
Why pay to sit on your phone for an hour when you can do the same thing for free with the precision of a mouse and keyboard? These are grainy images with no inherent color profiles, and will always look worse than pre-processed jpegs until they pass through an editing bay.
The thing is that editing lossless files isn’t speedy or mobile regardless of platform.
Therefore, the question becomes one of paying $10 for the speed and mobility of your phone, or nothing to use the laptop you already know and love.
#Fastrawviewer export android#
On the one hand, a desktop license for the Adobe Creative Suite is more expensive than any Android app, but on the other, editors like the GIMP and Raw Therapee are industry standard tools that can be had for free. My reservation with the paid suites is not quality, but cost. But don’t be fooled - the premium offerings like PhotoMate R2 are hell-bent on replacing your entire desktop workflow, and I have no doubt that they’re up to the task. Free or Paid? Despite the wealth of apps available, the only ones that tackle raw head-on are a handful of heavy-hitting suites with high price tags, and several freemium gallery and editor apps.
0 kommentar(er)
